Government Entities such as the Tenth Judicial Grievance Committee in New York are Part of the Problem and no where near a part of the Solution.
Christine Anderson New York Corruption Whistleblower
Enough is Enough New York.
Expose Corrupt Law Firms and the Judges Who Protect them.
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Thursday, February 3, 2011
New York's Tenth Judicial District Grievance Committee, Protecting Criminals EXPOSING Whistleblowers.
What is the Duty of the Chief Attorney Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District ?
What were the Duties and Responsibilities of the Chief Attorney Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York Rita Adler ? ( That Coming Soon )
Someone in the position of Chief Attorney Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Suffolk County - Nassau County, such as Rita Adler was, that has the power to take away licenses to do business, has the power to protect hundreds of millions of dollars in corporate crime and the power to change peoples lives entirely... well this SHOULD never have any kind of "Immunity".
Rita Adler should be held accountable for what she has done and so should the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District for Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York.
What were the Duties and Responsibilities of the Chief Attorney Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York Rita Adler ? ( That Coming Soon )
And did Rita Adler, Ex- Chief Attorney Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Suffolk County - Nassau County follow these Laws, Rules, Standards of Ethics ? I think Not.
Did Did Rita Adler obey the Laws of the State of New York? Should Rita Adler be Held accountable for the lives she has affecting adversely?
Should Rita Adler Be Dis-Barred ? Where is Rita Adler now and whose life is her total lack of Ethics affecting Now? All that and more Coming Soon to RitaAdler.com ....
Did Did Rita Adler obey the Laws of the State of New York? Should Rita Adler be Held accountable for the lives she has affecting adversely?
Should Rita Adler Be Dis-Barred ? Where is Rita Adler now and whose life is her total lack of Ethics affecting Now? All that and more Coming Soon to RitaAdler.com ....
Is Robert A. Green Chief Attorney Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York , Continuing the Legacy Of Corruption and Life Ruining Behavior that Rita Adler Left Behind?
Or is Robert A. Green cleaning up "Dirty" "Business as Usual" at the Tenth Judicial District Grievance Committee ?
Or is Robert A. Green cleaning up "Dirty" "Business as Usual" at the Tenth Judicial District Grievance Committee ?
The Facts are there, the Truth Speaks for Itself.
It all comes down to a matte of if Robert A. Green Tenth Judicial District Grievance Committee for Suffolk County and Nassau County, New York ... if Robert A. Green will read the facts, and uphold the laws of the United States of American and protect the Taxpaying Voters of New York or ... if Robert A. Green will protect the Corporate Greed, Money Machine and Wall of Corruption in New York that Rita Adler Boldly protected for so many years... and seemingly accountable to No One.. Oh of course but to Me and NOW that you Know the Facts.. Rita Adler - Robert A. Green - Leslie B. Anderson are accountable to ALL OF YOU.
It all comes down to a matte of if Robert A. Green Tenth Judicial District Grievance Committee for Suffolk County and Nassau County, New York ... if Robert A. Green will read the facts, and uphold the laws of the United States of American and protect the Taxpaying Voters of New York or ... if Robert A. Green will protect the Corporate Greed, Money Machine and Wall of Corruption in New York that Rita Adler Boldly protected for so many years... and seemingly accountable to No One.. Oh of course but to Me and NOW that you Know the Facts.. Rita Adler - Robert A. Green - Leslie B. Anderson are accountable to ALL OF YOU.
Rita Adler, Ex- Chief Attorney Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Suffolk County - Nassau County, Retired or Not is Still Liable for the Lives she has ruined, for her unEthical and Illegal behavior while Rita Adler, was Chief Attorney Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Suffolk County - Nassau County ... and I intend to Expose ever single one .. over her 4.5 year tenure..
Coming Soon Defamation Lawsuit(S) and Criminal Complaint(S) against Rita Adler personally and against Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District for Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York.
"Retirement" Does not mean "Immunity".
Someone in the position of Chief Attorney Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Suffolk County - Nassau County, such as Rita Adler was, that has the power to take away licenses to do business, has the power to protect hundreds of millions of dollars in corporate crime and the power to change peoples lives entirely... well this SHOULD never have any kind of "Immunity".
Rita Adler should be held accountable for what she has done and so should the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District for Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York.
Coming Soon What Judge, Laws, Ethics, Oversight is Responsible for the Behavior, Ethics, and Activities of the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District for Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York ? And are they paying any attention at all ? Or do they even know what is going on at the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District for Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York. Well if they don't know they soon will.
Also Coming soon what Exactly are the Duties, Responsibilities and Standard of Ethics that apply to Leslie B. Anderson - Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District for Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York ? What Liability does Leslie B. Anderson have in the Peter Sivere Case, the George Demos Issue or the Life and Economic Condition of New York Attorney Ruth Pollack?
Has the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District for Suffolk County - Nassau County - in the State of New York Ruined Your Life, Not Protected your Rights, Discriminated against you, Committed Fraud, aided and abetted corruption that you know of? Send your tip to me Crystal L. Cox ~ Investigative Blogger, Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Also Check Out the Peter Sivere Story at PeterSivere.com - $335 Million Dollars in JP Morgan Cover Ups, protecting Corrupt SEC investigator George Demos - what did Rita Adler and have to gain in protecting a Lie and not Defending the Whistleblower telling the Truth Peter Sivere Should have been Protected by National Whistle Blower Laws and the SEC Whistle Blower program and Peter Sivere was not. Why did Rita Adler Protect George Demos ? Why did Leslie B. Anderson protect George Demos ?
What Did "Chris Fox's" father in law really turn up on George Demos ? As he apparently hired New York Criminal Defense Attorney David Schwartz to investigate "look into" George Demos? What did they find, what was a blind eye turned on ?
Also Check out the Odd story of a New York Attorney with her licensed suspended and no real explanation it seems, no real reason... I Believe it was to cover up millions hidden by the Valley Stream No. 24 and Edward Fale .. and I intend to Prove it Coming Soon to EdwardFale.com - Every Dollar, every dirty .. I want to KNOW.. eMail me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Edward Fale is part of some cover up that has changed the life of one Honest New York Attorney, and ya know thats gotta be rare.. (Smile) anyway Edward Fale seems to be a part of the Problem and not the solution and has made the life of Kevin Chesney and Attorney Ruth Pollack Collateral Damage in whatever it is Edward Fale is hiding and for Whom.... so It is time I get to the bottom of what Edward Fale is REALLY up To. ( oh and just how is Rita Adler and Leslie B. Anderson connected to Edward Fale .. Really ? )
Edward Fale is part of some cover up that has changed the life of one Honest New York Attorney, and ya know thats gotta be rare.. (Smile) anyway Edward Fale seems to be a part of the Problem and not the solution and has made the life of Kevin Chesney and Attorney Ruth Pollack Collateral Damage in whatever it is Edward Fale is hiding and for Whom.... so It is time I get to the bottom of what Edward Fale is REALLY up To. ( oh and just how is Rita Adler and Leslie B. Anderson connected to Edward Fale .. Really ? )
Email me Your Story
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal L. Cox
the "LIE will NOT become the TRUTH on My Watch"
P.S - How's My "A Game" so Far ?
Pumpkin ?
Pumpkin ?
Friday, December 3, 2010
Montana Highway Patrol Corruption - Corrupt Protective Orders - Lee Newspaper Corruption - Steve Bullock Montana Attorney General Does NOTHING.
" Montana Justice System in Crisis
Being ranked last in the nation for justice is not well known in the State of Montana. Congressmen, Governors, Attorney General, and the FBI feel the problem can persist.
Its easier with a staff member in the White House since 2009 helping to cover up the problems....our own Jim Messina.
What happens when "built in protections" in the justice system become more mechanism forabusing rights of Americans who live in Montana?
When local judges know the prosecutors, and go their way on bail (8th Amendment), probable cause (14th Amendment), and other determinations (search and seizure; 4th Amendment) ordinary Americans in Montana are not getting their rights upheld.
That might be the reason we lost a Montana Highway Patrolman in three forks this week. Whilethe Associated Press (AP) wishes the nation to believe this 56 year old dog trainer was "bitter" from a former snake bite complication, the bitterness is the loss of liberty, the loss of rights, and the loss of control normal people have in their lives due to our out of control criminal justice system in Montana.
In Montana it is big business to place orders of protection, with supposed large federal grants that never seem to make it to the bottom line of municipal budgets.
Required paperwork seems to magically appear, and Lee Newspapers are willing to fill in the blanks for a price. We have no justice, or truth.
When an employee of the Attorney General office threatens a person's livelihood and house for questioning a county prosecutor, something is wrong in Montana.
That employee is now in charge of the Highway Patrol, and is also Attorney General, Steve Bullock (a Columbia Law graduate).
The MHP did not give test scores in 2008 to applicants "who did not make it" and had two uniformed officers put their hands on their holstered sidearms and asked the "unsuccessful" candidates to leave.
With letters, websites, blogs, and a documentary on justice, the Montana state and federal officials now need to understand that they were given information about the justice system prior to this officers ultimate sacrifice.
Denial is the first step, what is the next?"
Source of Post
Posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Got a Tip on Montana Highway Patrol Corruption, Cover Ups or ???
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
The LIE will NEVER
Stand as the Truth
On My Watch !!
On My Watch !!
More on Massive Corruption, Cover Ups and Illegal Activity in Montana by the Very Judicial System Paid to Protect Montana Citizens.
www.MontanaCorruption.com
Montana Corruption Rampant ~ Demand Transparency and Accountability.
Montana Corruption Rampant ~ Demand Transparency and Accountability.
www.HamiltonMontanaNews.com
Hamilton Montana News of Cover Ups, Corruption,
Pay Offs, Corrupt Judges in Ravalli County Montana
Hamilton Montana News of Cover Ups, Corruption,
Pay Offs, Corrupt Judges in Ravalli County Montana
www.EurekaMontanaNews.com
Lincoln County Montana Corruption Exposed
Lincoln County Montana Corruption Exposed
www.MontanaMoxy.com Montana News for the People by the People
Exposing Corrupt Hamilton Montana Justice of the Peace Robin Clute
Exposing Corruption in the Ravalli County Montana
County Attorney Office. ~ Though Corrupt Ravalli County
Attorney George Corn was voted out this blog will keep on
eye on what the Corrupt George Corn Does next and expose
past corruption as well as keep a future watch over
the Ravalli County Montana County Attorney Office.
Got a Story on a Corrupt Montana Justice of the Peace, Corrupt Montana Law Enforcement, Illegal Montana Protective Order, Set Ups to Silence Truth Tellers, Corrupt District Court Judges in the State of Montana, Stories of Asking the FBI - the Montana ACLU - Commissioners - Police for HELP and Being Ignored as they Protect the Criminals over the Victims Rights?
Email your Story to Me RIGHT NOW and Get Heard...
Crystal Cox Montana Investigative Blogger
"Montana Media"
WhistleBlower Media...
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Writ Of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court - Kevin G. Chesney - Chesney v. Valley Stream
" A Valley Stream man has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court October 2010 Term seeking review of a Second Circuit Court of Appeals fake docket and phantom appeal.
The application was made after the man, a former Valley Stream Union Free School District No. 24 custodian, was permanently disabled on the job, was unlawfully terminated and then filed a discrimination case in the Eastern District of New York.
When he filed an appeal of his case to the Second Circuit to obtain a review of the destruction of his entire court file and school district payroll records, he discovered that his appeal in the Circuit Court had never been assigned to a panel or judge, that orders were issued by unauthorized computer clerks and not judges, and that his PACER (Public Access Court Electronic Records) electronic docket for the Eastern District of New York had been so tampered and altered internally as to be completely unreliable.
His petition to the Supreme Court, copy annexed, outlines the severe, proven docket fraud and deprivation of all due process.
The case of first impression involves the constitutional violations resulting from tampering with a publically paid for government operated Internet system (PACER) used nationwide and worldwide by attorneys for individuals, corporations, public not for profits, immigrants, inmates and even accused terrorists.
The United States Supreme Court brief is called Chesney v. Valley Stream U.F.S.D. No. 24,Case No. 10-457. The petition and its appendix contain never before seen proof of fake dockets, orders and procedure in two New York federal courts. "
Source of Post and Full Document
The application was made after the man, a former Valley Stream Union Free School District No. 24 custodian, was permanently disabled on the job, was unlawfully terminated and then filed a discrimination case in the Eastern District of New York.
When he filed an appeal of his case to the Second Circuit to obtain a review of the destruction of his entire court file and school district payroll records, he discovered that his appeal in the Circuit Court had never been assigned to a panel or judge, that orders were issued by unauthorized computer clerks and not judges, and that his PACER (Public Access Court Electronic Records) electronic docket for the Eastern District of New York had been so tampered and altered internally as to be completely unreliable.
His petition to the Supreme Court, copy annexed, outlines the severe, proven docket fraud and deprivation of all due process.
The case of first impression involves the constitutional violations resulting from tampering with a publically paid for government operated Internet system (PACER) used nationwide and worldwide by attorneys for individuals, corporations, public not for profits, immigrants, inmates and even accused terrorists.
The United States Supreme Court brief is called Chesney v. Valley Stream U.F.S.D. No. 24,Case No. 10-457. The petition and its appendix contain never before seen proof of fake dockets, orders and procedure in two New York federal courts. "
"PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Petitioners Kevin G. Chesney and Lorraine
Chesney, ux., respectfully submit this petition for writ
of certiorari to review the fake “Order” dated May 5,
2010, which was not certified, mandated or sent to
the trial court by the Circuit Court, the purported
record on appeal, as well as the dockets leading up to
the May 5, 2010 “Order.”
STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL
PROVISIONS INVOLVED
SUP. CT. R. 10 and 11; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1734 and
1735, FED. R. APP. P. §§ 4(a)(1)(A), 41, 45, 45.1, the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. § 3501,
et seq.) Public Access Court Electronic Records
(PACER) at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov , CM/ECF
and CONST. amend. XIV, § 1, which provides, in
relevant part:|
No State shall . . . deprive any person of life,
liberty or property, without due process of
law. . . .
Paperwork Reduction Act § 3501 provides in
relevant part:
The purposes of this subchapter are to –
(1) minimize the paperwork burden for individuals,
small businesses, educational
and nonprofit institutions, Federal contractors,
State, local and tribal governments,
and other persons resulting from
the collection of information by or for the
Federal Government;
(2) ensure the greatest possible public
health benefit from and maximize the utility of information created, collected
maintained, used, shared and disseminated
by or for Federal Government;
(3) coordinate, integrate, and to the extent
practicable and appropriate, make uniform
Federal information resources
management policies and practices and
policies as a means to improve the
productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness
of Government programs, including reduction
of information collection burdens
on the public and the improvement of
delivery to the public;
(4) improve the quality and use of Federal
information to strengthen decisionmaking,
accountability, and openness in Government
and society;
(5) minimize the cost to the Federal Government
of the creation, collection, maintenance,
use, dissemination, and disposition
of information;
(6) strengthen the partnership between the
Federal Government and the State, local
and tribal governments by minimizing
the burden and maximizing the utility of
information created, collected, maintained,
used, disseminated and retained
by or for the Federal Government;
(7) provide for the dissemination of public
information on a timely basis, on equitable
terms, and in a manner that promotes
the utility of the information to
Source of Post and Full Document
Friday, August 27, 2010
Intel Has been EXPOSED to ALL the "Proper" Authorities for Over a Decade.
Intel Corp. and the Intel Cartel - Intel RICO Proof - Intel's Monopoly Tactics.. THIS is No Secret - It is Common Knowledge among those who are SUPPOSE to Protect Consumers, Investors, VICTIMS of Intel's Crimes.
It is Pretty Obvious to Me that the SEC, DOJ, FTC, USPTO, FBI and more "Officials" have been aware of Intel's Monopoly and well.. the Intel Mafai .. if there were Good Guys and Gals who Knew .. well I doubt that they Could Do ANYTHING about it as .. well a Wall of Corruption is Un-Stoppable or So it Seems.. however Now we have the Internet. . I Use their Intel Chip Cartel to EXPOSE them to YOU and let you know that YOUR being DUPED.. lied to.. cheated and well the FTC, SEC, DOJ, FBI .. well they ALL know.. and have for a LONG time..
As I was saying if there were those who wanted to tell you.. well htey feared Economic Terrorism.. Death Threats.. Family Threats.. and other Stuff.. that would Blow your Mind. .their Corruption Tactics are Sick.. and quite Tricky and utilize ALL branches of YOUR Judicial System.. Someone Can Be Bought Off .. Everywhere...
The Intel Network is extensive in terms of damage control and manipulating politicians, judges, SEC investigators.. and well pretty much everybody.. Do NOT Dare Cross Intel Nation !!!
I BELIEVE that Intel even controls the State Bar, Ethics Committees, Attorney Generals, Supreme Court Judges and Patent Officers at the USPTO...
And Well.. I Believe that movies like "the Jury" well .. I believe Intel buys Juries ALSO .. but hey what do I know .. I have NO Stocks.. I have no background in finance.. ALL I got .. is Well the Ability to READ and THINK for myself.. with that.. Well the Truth is Pretty Obvious..
It Seems there is A whole lot more trouble coming on all this as the next couple of months could be telling if teh FTC denies 9341 proposed consent proposal; in part at the very least. Or if SEC follows through. Or if DOJ follows through . . . or Senate or Congressional committees on commerce.
Will Intel every Admit their Flat out Fraud, Deceit, Negligence, or will Intel ever come clean on how they frame - set up those who write the TRUTH on Intel.. even if your Tax Dollars pay for that TRUTH ??
Defamation Lawsuits in the Billions Coming SOON to Intel Shareholders.. Proof is Soon to Role Out on Who at Intel Deliberately Ruined the Lives and Careers of Analysts and investigators that wrote TRUTH Reports on the Real CRIMES of Intel..
At that to the Trillions Intel Shareholders WILL Soon Pay over the Iviewit Stolen Technology and Bruce Sewell - Paul Otellini Knowing ALL along..
Add that to every state suing Intel for MONEY Back in Rebate and Bundling Scams.. and well a whole lot more.. and Well looks Like Intel Stock is About to be. .Worthless....
Oh JUST MY Opinion....
Funny when these Brave Men and Woman tell the Truth on Intel.. and Intel Bully's them.. Threatens them.. defames them.. WELL they demand justice.. THEY get a Good Lawyer.. RIGHT? Not.. as well Intel Controls the State Bar Right? the Judges Right? YOU get no Fair Trial when in Court with the Intel Mafia.
and Often Times well Intel and their Big Ol' Corrupt Check Book pays of YOUR attorney.. and well they even have been known to shut down the law firm and disappear.. so Paid off or ???
Intel Capital Corporation has even been known to bug the homes of these Investigators hired by your TAX Dollars.. Talk About Corrupt.. Talk about a War Zone.. all for Intel Corp. wanting to STOP you from getting a better product at a better price...
Oh and in Santa Clara County well Intel Nation Owns the Entire Judicial Branch.. IN MY OPINION.. and so Justice.. NOT even a Chance at That..
Intel Corp. in Santa Clara County SEEMS to Own the Superior Court Judges and well you have NO Rights. .the Truth is Absolutely Irrelevant and LAWS do NOT matter unless they cna be Enforced and When Up against the Intel Cartel - Well there is NO way to ENFORCE laws.. unless you want to be poor, tortured, harassed, or dead... oh Just in My Thinking and in my Opinion as well . .a Hick from the Stick.. WHO don't know much bout' this Here .. Intel - Technology Market Stuff...
Got a Tip on the Intel Mafia?
What has Intel Corp. Done to Silence YOU ?
Have you been Offered PAY for your VERDICT?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
It is Pretty Obvious to Me that the SEC, DOJ, FTC, USPTO, FBI and more "Officials" have been aware of Intel's Monopoly and well.. the Intel Mafai .. if there were Good Guys and Gals who Knew .. well I doubt that they Could Do ANYTHING about it as .. well a Wall of Corruption is Un-Stoppable or So it Seems.. however Now we have the Internet. . I Use their Intel Chip Cartel to EXPOSE them to YOU and let you know that YOUR being DUPED.. lied to.. cheated and well the FTC, SEC, DOJ, FBI .. well they ALL know.. and have for a LONG time..
As I was saying if there were those who wanted to tell you.. well htey feared Economic Terrorism.. Death Threats.. Family Threats.. and other Stuff.. that would Blow your Mind. .their Corruption Tactics are Sick.. and quite Tricky and utilize ALL branches of YOUR Judicial System.. Someone Can Be Bought Off .. Everywhere...
The Intel Network is extensive in terms of damage control and manipulating politicians, judges, SEC investigators.. and well pretty much everybody.. Do NOT Dare Cross Intel Nation !!!
I BELIEVE that Intel even controls the State Bar, Ethics Committees, Attorney Generals, Supreme Court Judges and Patent Officers at the USPTO...
And Well.. I Believe that movies like "the Jury" well .. I believe Intel buys Juries ALSO .. but hey what do I know .. I have NO Stocks.. I have no background in finance.. ALL I got .. is Well the Ability to READ and THINK for myself.. with that.. Well the Truth is Pretty Obvious..
It Seems there is A whole lot more trouble coming on all this as the next couple of months could be telling if teh FTC denies 9341 proposed consent proposal; in part at the very least. Or if SEC follows through. Or if DOJ follows through . . . or Senate or Congressional committees on commerce.
Will Intel every Admit their Flat out Fraud, Deceit, Negligence, or will Intel ever come clean on how they frame - set up those who write the TRUTH on Intel.. even if your Tax Dollars pay for that TRUTH ??
Defamation Lawsuits in the Billions Coming SOON to Intel Shareholders.. Proof is Soon to Role Out on Who at Intel Deliberately Ruined the Lives and Careers of Analysts and investigators that wrote TRUTH Reports on the Real CRIMES of Intel..
At that to the Trillions Intel Shareholders WILL Soon Pay over the Iviewit Stolen Technology and Bruce Sewell - Paul Otellini Knowing ALL along..
Add that to every state suing Intel for MONEY Back in Rebate and Bundling Scams.. and well a whole lot more.. and Well looks Like Intel Stock is About to be. .Worthless....
Oh JUST MY Opinion....
Funny when these Brave Men and Woman tell the Truth on Intel.. and Intel Bully's them.. Threatens them.. defames them.. WELL they demand justice.. THEY get a Good Lawyer.. RIGHT? Not.. as well Intel Controls the State Bar Right? the Judges Right? YOU get no Fair Trial when in Court with the Intel Mafia.
and Often Times well Intel and their Big Ol' Corrupt Check Book pays of YOUR attorney.. and well they even have been known to shut down the law firm and disappear.. so Paid off or ???
Intel Capital Corporation has even been known to bug the homes of these Investigators hired by your TAX Dollars.. Talk About Corrupt.. Talk about a War Zone.. all for Intel Corp. wanting to STOP you from getting a better product at a better price...
Oh and in Santa Clara County well Intel Nation Owns the Entire Judicial Branch.. IN MY OPINION.. and so Justice.. NOT even a Chance at That..
Intel Corp. in Santa Clara County SEEMS to Own the Superior Court Judges and well you have NO Rights. .the Truth is Absolutely Irrelevant and LAWS do NOT matter unless they cna be Enforced and When Up against the Intel Cartel - Well there is NO way to ENFORCE laws.. unless you want to be poor, tortured, harassed, or dead... oh Just in My Thinking and in my Opinion as well . .a Hick from the Stick.. WHO don't know much bout' this Here .. Intel - Technology Market Stuff...
Got a Tip on the Intel Mafia?
What has Intel Corp. Done to Silence YOU ?
Have you been Offered PAY for your VERDICT?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
FTC in Intel Settlement Talks; before July 22? Intel Closed Door Settlements with the FTC? Intel Executive Amnesty???
"FTC in Intel Settlement Talks; before July 22?
Please be advised this analyst is opposed to Intel closed door settlement with FTC on or before July 22; transparency being at issue.
Commissioners and discovery team know RICO, Sherman Act Section 1 and Section 2 per se violations are documented.
This analyst encourages the September hearing proceed accordingly for full disclosure, full remedies, consumer recovery which is a core value of the FTC’s charter.
Advantageously and for hearing efficiency, all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims lacking specific per se condemnation precedent, can be reviewed between the Section 1 and RICO Proofs, without fear of FTC 9341 overall case loss.
Including waste of Federal financial and manpower resource, further, that FCA has already been won on weight of evidence and is itself capable of recovering a portion, if not all, FTC 9341 litigation costs.
This analyst believes it important that every American know how to spot competition espionage occurring in the work place in real time, how to report in real time, how to resolve in real time and not over 18 year’s time as in my case.
In this continuing case of Intel Monopoly analysis, meant for FTC and DOJ discovery, leadership, error correction, law augments, inter Nation competition policy evolution, Intel Network, system and structural improvement, RICO and competition remedies and consumer recoveries.
In addition financial recovery of the economic damages for all targets harmed and pushed under by Intel Network, including in the Docket 9288 case obstruction are required under Intel’s DOJ antitrust compliance obligations.
That is for Intel and Network Executive Amnesty and or immunity from maximum antitrust and RICO damages. This would seem to include those associated with FTC Docket 9341.
I’d presume Intel is Participating in reversing the frame and fraud associated with Docket 9288 obstruction.
Alternatively in the face of a known obstruction in the administration of justice which includes witness tampering, fraudulent construction and white wash, the Docket 9341 clock could be reset to June 11, 1991.
June 11, 1991 is the inception of the Intel Insider Scheme enabling a complete Intel monopoly consumer recovery.
Pursuant to Docket 9341, I am concerned that $72 billion dollars in monopolization have been calculated.
And that the worldwide consumer recoverable from Intel tied charge back, and monopoly price of up to $42 billion, will be left un-recovered or left on the negotiating table in any FTC closed door Docket 9341 settlement.
Our knowing this fact of the consumer recoverable, legitimately, consumers are due their return from Intel and Network members.
The history of Intel class actions suggests any privately litigated consumer class action will be blown or settled on disproportionate values too harms.
This attorney opinion is supported by historical evaluation, including attorneys who would take the FCA, if not for their knowledge of the history of Intel market rigging, the various corporate political, time trap and litigation hurdles.
Intel Network adverse litigation for year’s has been sand bagged, blown, thrown and settled on minor causes with slim remedies and minor financial recovery in relation to harms. Here our countries history of private antitrust litigation ends until attorneys who would risk toughest corporate, political, legal and judicial hurdles resolves itself.
FTC and DOJ can restart that tradition of private antitrust litigation with full Intel Network disclosures, monopoly encompassing remedies and recoveries, where world wide consumer recoveries are due consumers including the Federal government.
Bursting boilers and the Federal Power, Garrison Dam Disaster and the Federal Power, Bar Pilots and the Federal Power, Finance & Securities Disaster and Federal Power, broken oil well valves and the Federal Power, broken regulatory & the Federal Power; fixing broken Intel and the Federal Power, transparently, offers the potential for one of Intel’s greatest legacies.
A cornerstone on which willing members of Bar and Bench, and corporate entities, will see and take action regulation seriously. Lacking Bar and Bench free from corporate political network control, I fear broken regulatory will remain.
A functional regulatory, Bar & Bench, are required first lines of monopoly and rackets error detection and correction.
Pursuant to FCA, I will be requesting Congress and/or President Obama please assign a Federal attorney for qui tam representation.
A case to whom I am recognized Relator and hold the U.S. Attorney recovery reward letter, having been steward for many years before and following my official Relator status.
No legitimate private attorney will take the case in the face of the market rig.
Fifth, finance and investment bankers use Quanda model, with price projection tools, to model Intel revenue and margins; like media retrospectively, to play the stock up to two years in advance.
Sixth, Intel inside individual stock traders can do the same thing as I’ve demonstrated to FTC and U.S. DOJ.
Seventh, the Intel Quanda on mass weight of use, retrospectively, extended Intel’s x86 and PC market rigs to the NASDAQ; including in relation to other exchanges.
Think about it, Intel Insider ability to play the stock of Intel and PC Dealers up to two years in advance is an extreme catalyst to rig not only individual stock prices, but the NASDAQ index itself.
The Quanda was used to rig markets;
Intel had DOJ 1st report responsibility.
Eight, combination and cartel proofs exist throughout Intel economic and system structural proofs. Structural proofs are easily deciphered from their component patterns and prove intent to monopolize per se. No other conduct proofs are required.
Nine, U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission are well aware of the Section 1 per se condemnations, Section 2 per se intent, RICO, Quanda and its reliance by Intel Network as one of their many market rigging tools.
Ten, for FTC there is no risk of Docket 9341 case loss where all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims concerning access to Intel component taper, Intel benchmark rigging, false statements to Federal procurement by Intel, Dealers and Agents concealing fraudulent and monopoly costs assessed on the Federal Government computer payment claims.
All can be heard within the bracket; Section 1 structure, Section 2 intent and RICO proofs. Please consider one of multiple proofs below:
In the RICO proof below, find partial classic Intel Xeon Tanner and Xeon Copper mine economic analysis. Playing signaling revealed by the Quanda, savvy PC Dealers were informed to stick with the quasi static equilibrium and back eddy offered by Xeon Tanner, and to avoid being washed over the falls that is Xeon Cascades.
Cascades is the Intel desktop microprocessor Copper mine 256, repackaged as a high performance Xeon server product at monopoly price premium and for dumping onto AMD. Xeon Cascades was not a high performance product and by June 2000 main board suppliers serving the broker system market, had rejected it, causing Intel to cancel its retail boxed version of the Cascade product line. Cascade’s was then left to sell through Intel primary Dealer channels.
Please note that AMD Opteron code names; Sledge Hammer and Claw Hammer, follow in response to Intel Network notice of Tanner signaling and pending Cascade predatory product dumping. Dumping is relied on by Intel a lot.
Strategically to stop current competitive product flows in channels or to make it unprofitable for competitors to enter that product category.
Full Document and Source:
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
on Top of Site...
Information by
Mike Bruzzone
Intel Case Technical Analysis since 1996
Camp Marketing Consultancy
posted Here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Got an Intel Insider Trading TIP?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Please be advised this analyst is opposed to Intel closed door settlement with FTC on or before July 22; transparency being at issue.
Commissioners and discovery team know RICO, Sherman Act Section 1 and Section 2 per se violations are documented.
This analyst encourages the September hearing proceed accordingly for full disclosure, full remedies, consumer recovery which is a core value of the FTC’s charter.
Advantageously and for hearing efficiency, all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims lacking specific per se condemnation precedent, can be reviewed between the Section 1 and RICO Proofs, without fear of FTC 9341 overall case loss.
Including waste of Federal financial and manpower resource, further, that FCA has already been won on weight of evidence and is itself capable of recovering a portion, if not all, FTC 9341 litigation costs.
This analyst believes it important that every American know how to spot competition espionage occurring in the work place in real time, how to report in real time, how to resolve in real time and not over 18 year’s time as in my case.
In this continuing case of Intel Monopoly analysis, meant for FTC and DOJ discovery, leadership, error correction, law augments, inter Nation competition policy evolution, Intel Network, system and structural improvement, RICO and competition remedies and consumer recoveries.
In addition financial recovery of the economic damages for all targets harmed and pushed under by Intel Network, including in the Docket 9288 case obstruction are required under Intel’s DOJ antitrust compliance obligations.
That is for Intel and Network Executive Amnesty and or immunity from maximum antitrust and RICO damages. This would seem to include those associated with FTC Docket 9341.
I’d presume Intel is Participating in reversing the frame and fraud associated with Docket 9288 obstruction.
Alternatively in the face of a known obstruction in the administration of justice which includes witness tampering, fraudulent construction and white wash, the Docket 9341 clock could be reset to June 11, 1991.
June 11, 1991 is the inception of the Intel Insider Scheme enabling a complete Intel monopoly consumer recovery.
Pursuant to Docket 9341, I am concerned that $72 billion dollars in monopolization have been calculated.
And that the worldwide consumer recoverable from Intel tied charge back, and monopoly price of up to $42 billion, will be left un-recovered or left on the negotiating table in any FTC closed door Docket 9341 settlement.
Our knowing this fact of the consumer recoverable, legitimately, consumers are due their return from Intel and Network members.
The history of Intel class actions suggests any privately litigated consumer class action will be blown or settled on disproportionate values too harms.
This attorney opinion is supported by historical evaluation, including attorneys who would take the FCA, if not for their knowledge of the history of Intel market rigging, the various corporate political, time trap and litigation hurdles.
Intel Network adverse litigation for year’s has been sand bagged, blown, thrown and settled on minor causes with slim remedies and minor financial recovery in relation to harms. Here our countries history of private antitrust litigation ends until attorneys who would risk toughest corporate, political, legal and judicial hurdles resolves itself.
FTC and DOJ can restart that tradition of private antitrust litigation with full Intel Network disclosures, monopoly encompassing remedies and recoveries, where world wide consumer recoveries are due consumers including the Federal government.
Bursting boilers and the Federal Power, Garrison Dam Disaster and the Federal Power, Bar Pilots and the Federal Power, Finance & Securities Disaster and Federal Power, broken oil well valves and the Federal Power, broken regulatory & the Federal Power; fixing broken Intel and the Federal Power, transparently, offers the potential for one of Intel’s greatest legacies.
A cornerstone on which willing members of Bar and Bench, and corporate entities, will see and take action regulation seriously. Lacking Bar and Bench free from corporate political network control, I fear broken regulatory will remain.
A functional regulatory, Bar & Bench, are required first lines of monopoly and rackets error detection and correction.
Pursuant to FCA, I will be requesting Congress and/or President Obama please assign a Federal attorney for qui tam representation.
A case to whom I am recognized Relator and hold the U.S. Attorney recovery reward letter, having been steward for many years before and following my official Relator status.
No legitimate private attorney will take the case in the face of the market rig.
Fifth, finance and investment bankers use Quanda model, with price projection tools, to model Intel revenue and margins; like media retrospectively, to play the stock up to two years in advance.
Sixth, Intel inside individual stock traders can do the same thing as I’ve demonstrated to FTC and U.S. DOJ.
Seventh, the Intel Quanda on mass weight of use, retrospectively, extended Intel’s x86 and PC market rigs to the NASDAQ; including in relation to other exchanges.
Think about it, Intel Insider ability to play the stock of Intel and PC Dealers up to two years in advance is an extreme catalyst to rig not only individual stock prices, but the NASDAQ index itself.
The Quanda was used to rig markets;
Intel had DOJ 1st report responsibility.
Eight, combination and cartel proofs exist throughout Intel economic and system structural proofs. Structural proofs are easily deciphered from their component patterns and prove intent to monopolize per se. No other conduct proofs are required.
Nine, U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission are well aware of the Section 1 per se condemnations, Section 2 per se intent, RICO, Quanda and its reliance by Intel Network as one of their many market rigging tools.
Ten, for FTC there is no risk of Docket 9341 case loss where all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims concerning access to Intel component taper, Intel benchmark rigging, false statements to Federal procurement by Intel, Dealers and Agents concealing fraudulent and monopoly costs assessed on the Federal Government computer payment claims.
All can be heard within the bracket; Section 1 structure, Section 2 intent and RICO proofs. Please consider one of multiple proofs below:
In the RICO proof below, find partial classic Intel Xeon Tanner and Xeon Copper mine economic analysis. Playing signaling revealed by the Quanda, savvy PC Dealers were informed to stick with the quasi static equilibrium and back eddy offered by Xeon Tanner, and to avoid being washed over the falls that is Xeon Cascades.
Cascades is the Intel desktop microprocessor Copper mine 256, repackaged as a high performance Xeon server product at monopoly price premium and for dumping onto AMD. Xeon Cascades was not a high performance product and by June 2000 main board suppliers serving the broker system market, had rejected it, causing Intel to cancel its retail boxed version of the Cascade product line. Cascade’s was then left to sell through Intel primary Dealer channels.
Please note that AMD Opteron code names; Sledge Hammer and Claw Hammer, follow in response to Intel Network notice of Tanner signaling and pending Cascade predatory product dumping. Dumping is relied on by Intel a lot.
Strategically to stop current competitive product flows in channels or to make it unprofitable for competitors to enter that product category.
Full Document and Source:
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
on Top of Site...
Information by
Mike Bruzzone
Intel Case Technical Analysis since 1996
Camp Marketing Consultancy
posted Here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Got an Intel Insider Trading TIP?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Apple Investor Warning - Bruce Sewell Apple's General Counsel is NOT doing His Job and Apple PR Lead Steve Dowling is Covering for Bruce Sewell
Headlines Read
"Apple manager held on kickback charges"
- Hmmmm
My Guess is Paul Shin Devine is the fall guy for some BIGGER players..
I mean where is the Corrupt Bruce Sewell Fit into this One.. ?? and Come on a Million Dollars is NOTHING in the world of Apple, iPhone, and Computer Technology.. I Smell a RAT !!
These Billionaire Companies often pay around $50 Million Just to Call off Mergers.. I mean what in the world is the REAL issue over a Million Dollars.. when Apple is Making Billions on Top of Billions from Technology they have Stolen or in using Technoloty that their Apple General Counsel KNOWS is Stolen such as the Iviewit Stolen Patent.
From what I believe of Bruce Sewell, well he probably knew of Paul Shin Devine's activities and helped Paul Shin Devine pull it off.. I mean come on ... Apple PR Guy - Steve Dowling is So Absolutely full of Shit that Steve Dowling ~ Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."
So Apples Lead PR Guru, Genius Dipshit Steve Dowling Flat Out Lies Saying that Apple has Zero Tolerance for Dishonest Behavior Inside or Outside of the Company. What a Crock Steve Dowling, Apple is part of a Massive Shareholder Fraud Coverup in the Iviewit Technologies Inc. Stolen Technology and Apple General Counsel Corrupt Attorney Bruce Sewell has known of the Iviewit Scandal for a VERY Long Time. In Fact Bruce Sewell knew of the Iviewit Scandal before Bruce Sewell Left Intel Corp. as their General Counsel under "Mysterious" circumstances.
Wonder what Apple Lead PR Genius Steve Dowling has to Say about Apple Owing Billions to the Iviewit Technologies Company. OR What APPLE PR lead Steve Dowling has to Say about Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel and Bruce Sewell's Role in the Corrupt Intel Corp. Stealing and Using the Inviewit Technology Inventions ???
What Does PR Guy - Steve Dowling for Apple have to Say about the iPhone Technology that uses the Stolen Technology of the Iviewit Inventors and is VERY Known by Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ?
Steve Dowling Also .. and Seems to Be Serious as Steve Dowling Says it.. Well Steve Says, ""Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. " - OMG How can Steve Dowling Keep a Straight Face Saying this Crap.. ?? That is a Flat Out Lie, just Look at the History of APPLE big dicking the little guy, squashing on Inventor Rights and in some cases flat out Stealing Inventions.. or Licenses to Use them..
In Todays News, that .. Well To Me is Steaming with Back Stories and Scandals Galore.. Anyway Steve Dowling Here is Todays Apple Corruption News..
"Apple manager held on kickback charges - Apple manager arrested for alleged $1M in kickbacks"
An Apple manager was arrested Friday for allegedly accepting kickbacks from Asian suppliers, totaling more than $1 million.
Paul Shin Devine worked at Apple as a global supply manager and allegedly used his position to obtain confidential information from the company, according to the San Jose Mercury News. The information was then allegedly sold to the suppliers, helping them negotiate more favorable contracts with Apple.
"Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."
The companies involved in the kickback scheme were not named in the federal indictment, but it is known that they were suppliers of iPhone and iPod accessories.
Devine allegedly opened foreign bank accounts in his wife's name to disguise payments. It's not known at this time what tipped off the FBI and IRS to the kickback scheme or how deeply Apple was involved in the investigation.
In a separate action, Apple filed a civil suit against Devine for the kickbacks he allegedly received over several years.
Devine will appear in a San Jose court on Monday. "
Source of Post on Bruce Sewell, Paul Shin Devine, Steve Dowling
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20013665-37.html
So Paul Shin Devine - Got any Secrets On Apple or on Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ? If so I am All Blogger Ears and Ready to EXPOSE Bruce Sewell for the Corrupt, Evil, Technology Stealing, Criminal Assisting Gentleman that Bruce Sewell Really Is.. So Paul Shin Devine email me Crystal L. Cox ~ Investigative Blogger - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Attention anyone Knowing Paul Shin Devine - My Guess is that Paul Shin Devine is being set up for something bigger and that Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel Knows About it..
So If you know Paul Shin Devine - eMail me a Tip on this Story,
I know there is MORE to It... Crystal@CrystalCox.com
"Apple manager held on kickback charges"
- Hmmmm
My Guess is Paul Shin Devine is the fall guy for some BIGGER players..
I mean where is the Corrupt Bruce Sewell Fit into this One.. ?? and Come on a Million Dollars is NOTHING in the world of Apple, iPhone, and Computer Technology.. I Smell a RAT !!
These Billionaire Companies often pay around $50 Million Just to Call off Mergers.. I mean what in the world is the REAL issue over a Million Dollars.. when Apple is Making Billions on Top of Billions from Technology they have Stolen or in using Technoloty that their Apple General Counsel KNOWS is Stolen such as the Iviewit Stolen Patent.
From what I believe of Bruce Sewell, well he probably knew of Paul Shin Devine's activities and helped Paul Shin Devine pull it off.. I mean come on ... Apple PR Guy - Steve Dowling is So Absolutely full of Shit that Steve Dowling ~ Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."
So Apples Lead PR Guru, Genius Dipshit Steve Dowling Flat Out Lies Saying that Apple has Zero Tolerance for Dishonest Behavior Inside or Outside of the Company. What a Crock Steve Dowling, Apple is part of a Massive Shareholder Fraud Coverup in the Iviewit Technologies Inc. Stolen Technology and Apple General Counsel Corrupt Attorney Bruce Sewell has known of the Iviewit Scandal for a VERY Long Time. In Fact Bruce Sewell knew of the Iviewit Scandal before Bruce Sewell Left Intel Corp. as their General Counsel under "Mysterious" circumstances.
Wonder what Apple Lead PR Genius Steve Dowling has to Say about Apple Owing Billions to the Iviewit Technologies Company. OR What APPLE PR lead Steve Dowling has to Say about Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel and Bruce Sewell's Role in the Corrupt Intel Corp. Stealing and Using the Inviewit Technology Inventions ???
What Does PR Guy - Steve Dowling for Apple have to Say about the iPhone Technology that uses the Stolen Technology of the Iviewit Inventors and is VERY Known by Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ?
Steve Dowling Also .. and Seems to Be Serious as Steve Dowling Says it.. Well Steve Says, ""Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. " - OMG How can Steve Dowling Keep a Straight Face Saying this Crap.. ?? That is a Flat Out Lie, just Look at the History of APPLE big dicking the little guy, squashing on Inventor Rights and in some cases flat out Stealing Inventions.. or Licenses to Use them..
In Todays News, that .. Well To Me is Steaming with Back Stories and Scandals Galore.. Anyway Steve Dowling Here is Todays Apple Corruption News..
"Apple manager held on kickback charges - Apple manager arrested for alleged $1M in kickbacks"
An Apple manager was arrested Friday for allegedly accepting kickbacks from Asian suppliers, totaling more than $1 million.
Paul Shin Devine worked at Apple as a global supply manager and allegedly used his position to obtain confidential information from the company, according to the San Jose Mercury News. The information was then allegedly sold to the suppliers, helping them negotiate more favorable contracts with Apple.
"Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."
The companies involved in the kickback scheme were not named in the federal indictment, but it is known that they were suppliers of iPhone and iPod accessories.
Devine allegedly opened foreign bank accounts in his wife's name to disguise payments. It's not known at this time what tipped off the FBI and IRS to the kickback scheme or how deeply Apple was involved in the investigation.
In a separate action, Apple filed a civil suit against Devine for the kickbacks he allegedly received over several years.
Devine will appear in a San Jose court on Monday. "
Source of Post on Bruce Sewell, Paul Shin Devine, Steve Dowling
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20013665-37.html
So Paul Shin Devine - Got any Secrets On Apple or on Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ? If so I am All Blogger Ears and Ready to EXPOSE Bruce Sewell for the Corrupt, Evil, Technology Stealing, Criminal Assisting Gentleman that Bruce Sewell Really Is.. So Paul Shin Devine email me Crystal L. Cox ~ Investigative Blogger - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Attention anyone Knowing Paul Shin Devine - My Guess is that Paul Shin Devine is being set up for something bigger and that Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel Knows About it..
So If you know Paul Shin Devine - eMail me a Tip on this Story,
I know there is MORE to It... Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)