Where there is Billions Lost by Investors and Trillion Dollar Patent Thefts, there is Proskauer Rose LLP and the US Second Circuit Court.

US Second Circuit Court Seems to Ignore Emergency Request
to Investigate Proskauer Rose LLP.

Information from March 2009 included in Eliot Bernstein's Complaint to the SEC On Proskauer Rose... Time Warner, Warner Bros., Intel Corp, SGI, Lockheed Martin and More...

Was anyone listening to Eliot I. Bernstein? Or was the Madoff Liquidation of Assets just simply another layer to an already corruption Multi-Billion Dollar investment scheme...

From Eliot Bernstein's Blog on his SEC Complaint listing Warner Bros., AOL, Time Warner, Ernst Young, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin and explaining a whole lot more about the names and players of the Trillion Dollar Stolen Iviewit Patent, and the Involvement and Cover Ups for and by Proskauer Rose LLP - Meg Law Firm.

" " March 02, 2009 “EMERGENCY MOTION TO INVESTIGATE PROSKAUER ROSE DEFENDANTS INVOLVEMENT IN THE ALLEN STANFORD FINANCIAL, THE BERNARD MADOFF AND THE MARC DRIER FRAUD SCANDALS.

REMOVE PROSKAUER FROM SELF REPRESENTATION IN THESE MATTERS UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE FBI REMOVES THEM FROM THE ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE STANFORD FINANCIAL FRAUD”

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090302%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20Re%20Proskauer%20Stanford%20Madoff%20Dreier%20Scandals4017.pdf

I filed Motions at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals and US District Court, already exhibited herein, with similar claims of regulatory failures of the prior Presidential administration. Failures allegedly directly related to the Madoff case and I have reported this to Federal Authorities.

The Motions also discuss Conflicts centering on the Madoff saga where Proskauer publicly identified their firm as having the most clients in the Madoff Ponzi and now it is revealed in the press that many Madoff clients are the subject of ongoing SEC investigations.

The Motion at the US Second Circuit is to Compel that court to address the Conflicts of Interest and other matters according to law, laws being ignored while the Court and the Defendants perpetuate never ending Conflicts and Crimes. Note here that the handling of the Madoff Ponzi is by the same courts handling my RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and that the same courts were notified for months of the correlations between the Madoff Ponzi and my Lawsuit and have failed to notify the proper authorities, including the SEC and instead attempted to bury my lawsuit and motions.

The SEC should further note that in the courts handling my Lawsuit, many of the judges and clerks are also Defendants in the Lawsuit and despite the obvious conflicts, they continue to handle the matters, as if no rules or laws apply to them.

These illegal actions by members of the courts should also be cause for the SEC, FBI and others addressed herein to investigate the members of the courts involved for possible collusion and aiding and abetting these schemes through Fraud on the Courts.

Following this Formal Complaint, for the courts failures to address the conflicts and misprision of a felony, the three Second Circuit Judges involved in my appeal will be filed on for Criminal Obstruction and other crimes, as exhibited already in the Motion to Compel.

The SEC should note here that the US Second Circuit has recently attempted to evade the Motion to Compel, by attempting to dismiss the Appeal as baseless, while the related Whistleblower case remains ongoing.

Sneaky as it sounds, by dismissing the case, the court has evaded addressing the criminal charges levied against them and the request for oversight of their criminal actions, as set forth in the Motion to Compel. This brilliant but failed attempt to evade the Motion to Compel, without having to rule on their conflicts or answer the charges against them, despite factual and material conflicts of interests in the court, further evidences their continued criminal obstruction.

All those addressed herein, should therefore immediately begin investigation of the Second Circuit and US District Court for the Southern District of New York court officials involved. Especially concerning their concealment from authorities of these material facts relating to these Schemes, again which may be a Misprision of Felony and whereby had the courts acted within law they could have prevented injury to many victims in these Schemes years earlier, when I initially reported Proskauer’s misdeeds to them.

This information should be cause for the SEC to reanalyze the entire Madoff Scheme in light of this new evidence. All asset sales and other distributions should instantly be halted until these material facts can be reviewed to determine if these funds are also relating to the Iviewit stolen patents. " "

Click here for Source of this Post and the Entire SEC Complaint

Wake Up Mary Schapiro - this is and has been a Financial EMERGENCY for a VERY long time..

Posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

If you have any information on Proskauer Rose's further involvement in the Standford Affair, the Madoff Scheme or any dirty deeds or favors owed that would make it so that Proskauer Rose LLP can seem to hold no accountability for Billions of Dollars of Shareholder Loss... Please Email Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox at Crystal@CrytalCox.com
blog
crystal cox

from Iviewit Blogosphere Blog - on Proskauer Rose and Stanford and the Iviewit Money Trail

"Proskauer (Porksour) Rose Law Firm Going Down in Allen Stanford Ponzi, next the trail of money may lead to Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s stolen Trillion Dollar Patents

http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2010/01/stanfords-lawyers.html

AM Law

TPM Shines Spotlight on Allen Stanford’s Lawyers

Posted by Brian Baxter

R. Allen Stanford’s principal in-house and outside lawyers are once again under the glare of the media, this time from Talking Points Memo. The blog looked at the work done by former Greenberg Traurig lawyers Yolanda Suarez and Carlos Loumiet for the disgraced financier. Loumiet left Greenberg for Hunton & Williams in 2001, and Suarez served as Stanford’s legal counsel and chief of staff after working at Greenberg as an associate in the early 1980s.

TPM reports that Loumiet and Suarez played integral roles in shielding Stanford from regulatory scrutiny and forging close ties between the Texas-based businessman and members of Congress. (Federal law enforcement officials are probing Stanford’s congressional ties, according to a recent report by the Miami Herald.)

TPM singled out Loumiet’s work drafting anti-money laundering legislation for Antigua, the Caribbean island nation where Stanford based his offshore operations. (We reported on Greenberg’s work for Stanford in October, picking up on another report from the Herald.) Loumiet touts the work on his current Hunton bio and TPM references an interview the lawyer gave to The Washington Post in 1999 defending Stanford, who also holds Antiguan citizenship.

When Loumiet left Greenberg for Hunton in 2001, he took Stanford’s business with him. (Loumiet referred TPM’s requests for comment to a Hunton spokeswoman, who declined to comment.)

As we noted late last year, the Stanford matter isn’t Loumiet’s first brush with scandal. At Greenberg, where Loumiet served as head of the firm’s international banking practice, he became ensnared in the collapse of Hamilton Bank in 2002.

In June 2008, a federal judge ruled that there was insufficient evidence linking Loumiet to a fraud that caused his client to go under. Unlike his former firm and another partner, who paid almost $1 million in fines without admitting guilt, Loumiet refused to settle with a banking regulator.

But Loumiet and Suarez aren’t the only lawyers to be tarred by their Stanford affiliations. Both Proskauer Rose and Chadbourne & Parke have been sued in a class action filed by a group of Stanford clients.

Also named in the class action suit was former Stanford general counsel P. Mauricio Alvarado, a Vinson & Elkins alum whose abrupt resignation shortly before the SEC filed charges had some securities lawyers warning in-house counsel to be vigilant.

Ex-Proskauer partner Thomas Sjoblom, a former SEC attorney and longtime outside counsel to Stanford, resigned from the firm in October. Sjoblom and Proskauer were also sued by a senior Stanford executive early last year.

Stanford, who is reportedly battling demons of his own while he remains incarcerated, is set to go on trial in January 2011. ""

Source of Post and More information
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=256

posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

More on the Trillion Dollar STOLEN Iviewit Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV - and - www.DeniedPatent.com

Does Mary Shapiro SEC Boss, Know about the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and Its HUGE Implications to Shareholders?

YOU Bet She Does...

How Will She Explain what She has Let Happen
in a Trillion Dollar Liability to Shareholders...???

It seems from Many documents at www.Iviewit.TV That Mary Shapiro of the SEC had knowledgle long ago about what Proskauer Rose was up to and yet .. what ?? the Standford affair is some NEW Shocker of a Story, yet Mary Shapiro had been given notice by Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Company years before the Billion Dollar Scandal hit the Main Stream Media.

Does Mary Shapiro or the SEC have ANY Liability to the Shareholders when they had advance knowledge of the Players and did nothing to prevent the Standford Affair?

$65 Billion in the Bernie Madoff Scheme is NOT all that Mary Shapiro and the SEC missed... What about the Standford Affair - Billions and Connected to Proskauer Rose. What About Enron and Proskauer Connections - and what about all the Players, Shareholder Fraud, and Liability that the Eliot Bernstein of the Iviewit Technologies Company has brought to Mary Shapiro and the SEC's Attention ?

What do they say, I just did not know or see this coming? So Sorry you Lost Billions - I had no Way of Knowing... well Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger says.. "BULL, Mary Shapiro and the SEC knew" and they IGNORED leads, had no one seemingly watching websites, reading documents, scouring blogs or even looking into leads that led to BILLIONS of Innocent Investors losing their Money.

The SEC has no purpose that is really beneficial and in my Opinion is just as susceptible as being Bought Off as anyone other Corrupt Government Agent, Attorney, CEO or Judge" .

Won't it be Amusing when Warner Brothers, Intel Corp., Sony, AOL, and all those Billion Dollar Tech Companies go Belly up and take the Shareholders to Bankruptcy because of the Contracts they signed and did not fulfill with the Iviewit Technologies Company that puts them in Connection and at least in part Liable for a Trillion Dollar Liability that they SEEM to have overlooked on their Books with all their bragging of Profits this quarter... blah .. blah.. blah.. and what Does Mary Shapiro Say? Is she even Acknowledging any of it?

Won't it be Hysterically when the SEC, when Mary Shapiro says to the Warner Brothers, AOL, Intel Corp, Sony ... Shareholders that Gee I just didn't see that Trillion Dollar HIT Coming.. We had no warning.. other then the years of complaints filed from the Iviewit Technologies Company in Which I IGNORED.. gee Sorry..

It is not Personal, it is Business,
Mary Schapiro - YOUR FIRED !!!..

posted By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox...
Crystal Cox
More on the Obvious, Blatant Shareholder Fraud among tons of Major Tech Companies.. and the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV over a thousand documents of Proof So Far.
Mary Shapiro
Research Links on Mary Shapiro and her Knowledge of possible Shareholder Fraud in which, to me it looks like she did nothing, and well Billions upon Billions are lost by innocent Investors. And the Potention of Trillions More...

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf

http://www.trialbyblog.com/2010/01/eliot-i-bernstein-intel-corporation-sec.html

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-trillion-fed-suit-defendant-proskauer-rose-sued-in-global-class-action-re-stanford-ponzi-1252249099.html

http://seekingalpha.com/user/478415/comments/highest-rated

http://www.stolenpatent.com/2010_01_01_archive.html


Gee Sorry ... NO One Brought it to My Attention: I just Did not See ANY sign of this COMING... What a Crock that Will BE..

Crystal Cox Blogger

Shocking Turn - Former Iviewit Technologies CEO,P. Stephen Lamont Tells Investigative Blogger - Whistleblower- Crystal L. Cox to Get Affairs in Order.

The Iviewit Stolen Patent Case Involves some of the Wealthiest Tech Companies in the World such as Intel. Corp, IBM, Sony and other major media companies such as Warner Bros. and Time Warner Inc., and AOL, SGI, MPEG LA ... and many more.

the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case involves Major, Big Money Law Firms connected to the Wealthiest Corporations in the World Such as Foley and Lardner LLP, Proskuaer Rose LLP, Greenberg Traurig, and more ....

Also in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case We have Major CEO's, High Powered General Counsel's of Major Corporations, HUGE Medial Relations and PR companies and well the Biggest of the Big in Finance, News, Investments, Tech Companies, Politics and Law Firms.

None whom have emailed or Threatened me
in any way thus far into my Iviewit Stolen Patent Writings.
Blog

The Players in this Stolen Patent Case have Political Connections, Connections in the Defense Department, Homeland Security, the Bradley Foundation, the Bush Administration and Well they have the most money and most power in the Entire World and NONE of them have emailed me, sent me a Cease and Desist, Called my Home
or Threatened me in any way.

So you can Imagine my Complete Surprise when an Iviewit Insider Called my Home, left no message and sent me an email that I deem as a Death Threat.

It may not seem that way to you but it sure feels that way to me.
iviewit

P. Stephen Lamont told me basically to get my Affairs in Order and other talk about emails I have no idea what he is talking about.
Stephen Lamont Emails ME

I have posted all Correspondence from P. Stephen Lamont to me, Crystal L. Cox ~ Industry Whistleblower on this Blog and several other of my Industry Whistle Blower sites.

Up until a few days ago I thought that P. Stephen Lamont was on the side of getting the Shareholders their rightful money and getting the Inventors the Rights to their Patent, another words ... Up Until a Few Days ago I thought P. Stephen Lamont was on the
Right Side of the Law, and the Right Side of the Moral Compass.

However, Now I am seriously confused as to what
P. Stephen Lamont's motive's are.
iviewit

You can plainly see from this site and my other writings on the iViewit Stolen Patent case, that I am writing to simply to expose the facts, the court documents and related information to get this Shocking Story of Court Corruption, Attorney Favoritism, US Patent Fraud, and Corruption in the US Court System ... told .. as well as to stand up for the little guy and not little guy like you may thinking.. a Case of Millionaires, Investors and Inventors Vs. Billionaires, Political and Financial Elite and the Courts and Attorneys that Keep them In Business....

the Iviewit company invested Millions upon Millions, as did the SBA and Related banks such as Wachovia, as well as investors like Ellen Degeneres and tons more who are iviewit Shareholders denied of their rights, their money seemingly Stolen by a Corrupt Patent Office, Court Corruption, and Attorneys Covering Up Each others Lies and Illegal Behavoir.

So why would a Former CEO be causing such a Stir ?
And Why Now ?
iviewit patent case

Why would a FORMER CEO be trying to get me to stop writing about anything? It is not really his Current Concern is it? Other then Shareholder money which many other Shareholders hope they see some day.

Why would a Formor Iviewit Technologies CEO Demand that I include him in all correspondence on the iViewit Company and Include him on ANY and ALL correspondence with the Owner of the iViewit Company - and one of the Inventors of the iViewit Technology?

Does a Former CEO have a Right to Make such Requests?

Ok well here is Today's Email.. of Which It Sounds to Me Like I had Better Get My Affairs in Order While I still can, According to P. Stephen Lamont.

************
Crystal Cox Blogger
Stephen Lamont Phoned My Home Last Night
He Left No Message, Today He Sent me
This Threatening Email
from lamont

" Ms. Cox:

I understand you have transmitted an email, which I have not received.

As I indicate below, continue your investigation, and if you come up with even one incidence where I have caused harm to Iviewit shareholders in our quest to own the video and imaging world then we can begin a dialogue.

Until then, however, you have been put on notice to remove my name from your various blog sites, and I will expect you will govern your affairs accordingly, while you still have some affairs to govern, that is.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/ "

I know many of you wonder Why don't I tell the FBI, however the FBI does not Care, I have told them of Criminal Activity before and they don't bother to respond, or look into it and seem to have local law in the area of the Crime simple make the Criminal Look like the Good Guy.
crystal l. cox
I can only suspect that the FBI themselves are controlled just as all the Other High Courts, Judges, Huge Law Firms, Patent Office, Supreme Court and others that are Keeping this Trillion Dollar Patent Theft a Secret from Shareholders, Investors and Refusing to Give the Inventors the Rights to what they invented, Though This Big Boys having been using the Technology for Years upon Years...
Crystal Cox Blog
In the email above from P. Stephen Lamont to Crystal L. Cox, The part about an email that I have Transmitted and he has not received, that is so cryptic and kind of funny - I have no idea what it means as I have sent tons of emails in which he has not received - for they were not to him. I have no idea what he is Talking About.
Crystal L Cox
He talks about my "investigation" what does that mean?
blog
I am pretty much an investigative journalist, I research and I post, I am not conducting some sort of Official "investigation" and again have no idea what P. Stephen Lamont is Getting At here.
Crystal L. Cox
In my opinion, from my research, I don't understand how P. Stephen Lamont thinks he is any part of owning the video and imaging world, he WAS a CEO, he is a Shareholder.. that's it.
crystal l cox
I mean if your hired on as a CEO does that mean you own, run and control a Company?
crystal cox
Can a Former CEO go Seemingly Rogue and initiate Legal Complaints, and make Demands on behalf of a Company he is no longer affiliated with other then owning shares?
Iviewit Stolen Patent Case
If so, then all the iViewit Shareholders would seemingly have that same right.
Stolen Patent
It just does not Make Sense.
Iviewit
P. Stephen Lamont Now Phoning me and Sending me Cryptic, Threatening Emails after 2 months of writing on the Iviewit Stolen Patent, well, I just don't understand it.
Crystal Cox
Surely a Smart man like P. Stephen Lamont
Seen My Sites before Feb. 4th.
Patent
SO What Changed, Why Now ?
Crystal L. Cox
If you have any information on the Motives of P. Stephen Lamont,
please email our Whistle blower Hot line at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Posted by Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

More on the Iviewit Technology
Stolen Patent Case at www.DeniedPatent.com
and www.iViewit.TV

crystal l cox